{"id":32411,"date":"2026-07-08T19:24:28","date_gmt":"2026-07-08T18:24:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/claruswms.ai\/?p=32411"},"modified":"2026-10-12T14:09:23","modified_gmt":"2026-10-12T13:09:23","slug":"clarus-mot-korber","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/claruswms.ai\/nb\/clarus-vs-korber\/","title":{"rendered":"Clarus WMS vs. K\u00f6rber: Hvilket WMS-system passer best for ditt 3PL-lager?"},"content":{"rendered":"

When you\u2019re evaluating warehouse management software, the choice between Clarus WMS and K\u00f6rber WMS (formerly HighJump, now part of Infios<\/a>) comes down to one question: what does your warehouse actually need to do?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both are capable warehouse management systems with multi-client support, but they\u2019re built for different operational contexts. Infios is best known for enterprise deployments: large warehouses with significant investment in conveyors, robotics and labour management. Clarus is a 3PL WMS<\/a> built for multi-client warehousing, quicker deployment and published pricing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This comparison is for 3PLs, distributors and mid-market warehouse operators weighing up their options. We cover cost, implementation speed, multi-client capability and feature depth, so you can make the right call for your operation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rask sammenligning: Clarus og K\u00f6rber p\u00e5 et blikk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Dimensjon<\/th>Clarus WMS<\/th>K\u00f6rber WMS (K\u00f6rber One)<\/th><\/tr>
Best for<\/strong><\/td>3PL-leverand\u00f8rer, mellomstore distribut\u00f8rer, 10 til over 300 brukere<\/td>Store automatiserte lager, logistikknettverk for store bedrifter<\/td><\/tr>
Skyarkitektur<\/strong><\/td>Serverl\u00f8s, skybasert; daglige oppdateringer, ingen nedetid ved oppgradering<\/td>\u00abCloud-first\u00bb (mulighet for lokal drift); versjonsbaserte utgivelser<\/td><\/tr>
Mulighet for flere klienter<\/strong><\/td>Innebygd; kundesegmentering, fakturering per kunde, kundeportal inkludert<\/td>Tilgjengelig; krever tilleggsmodul\/\u00f8kt kompleksitet<\/td><\/tr>
Tidsplan for gjennomf\u00f8ring<\/strong><\/td>Uker, ikke kvartaler. Konfigurasjonsbasert.<\/td>Et program som strekker seg over flere m\u00e5neder. Be K\u00f6rber om \u00e5 forplikte seg til datoen i en kontrakt.<\/td><\/tr>
Prismodell<\/strong><\/td>Offentliggjorte prisniv\u00e5er med en grunnpris p\u00e5 1 000 \u00a3 per m\u00e5ned, pluss trinnvise brukerlisenser og et engangsgebyr for implementering. Ingen avgifter for datagjennomstr\u00f8mning.<\/td>Ikke offentliggjort. Priser for bedriftskunder fastsettes etter tilbud, og avtalene l\u00f8per vanligvis over flere \u00e5r.<\/td><\/tr>
3PL faktureringsautomatisering<\/strong><\/td>I sanntid, automatisert; registrerer alle fakturerbare hendelser (mottak, lagring, plukking, pakking, utsendelse, returer)<\/td>Tilgjengelig; krever ofte tilpasset konfigurasjon og profesjonelle tjenester<\/td><\/tr>
Integrasjonsbibliotek<\/strong><\/td>Over 200 ferdige l\u00f8sninger (Shopify, WooCommerce, Sage, Brightpearl, over 70 transport\u00f8rer)<\/td>Over 500 integrasjoner (SAP, Oracle, Azure, med fokus p\u00e5 ERP-systemer for store bedrifter)<\/td><\/tr>
Automatiseringsfunksjoner<\/strong><\/td>B\u00f8lgeplukking, m\u00e5lrettet innlagring, skanningskontroll, AI-lagerassistent<\/td>Komplett WCS (lagerkontrollsystem) + WMS; robotteknologi, transportb\u00e5ndautomatisering, arbeidsoptimalisering<\/td><\/tr>
Svarstid for support<\/strong><\/td>Gjennomsnitt p\u00e5 under 2 minutter<\/td>Trinnvise SLA-er; standard for bedriftsavtaler<\/td><\/tr>
Kunder<\/strong><\/td>Over 100 virksomheter over hele verden; hovedsakelig 3PL-selskaper og mellomstore distribut\u00f8rer i Storbritannia og Benelux-landene<\/td>Over 1 600 globalt; store distribusjonssentre, drift med h\u00f8y grad av automatisering, detaljhandelsnettverk for store bedrifter<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Konklusjon i ett setning:<\/strong> Choose Clarus if you need a WMS built for multi-client 3PL operations, with published pricing and a go-live measured in weeks. Choose Infios if you\u2019re running a large, automation-heavy distribution centre with an enterprise budget and a 4 to 8 month implementation window.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is K\u00f6rber WMS (now Infios)?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

K\u00f6rber WMS is the warehouse management system from K\u00f6rber\u2019s supply chain software business, which acquired HighJump in 2017<\/a>. That business became a joint venture between K\u00f6rber AG and KKR, and in March 2025 it rebranded as Infios. The product is now sold as Infios Warehouse Management<\/a>, available as SaaS or on-premise, with 1,600+ WMS customers across the Americas, Europe and Asia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Infios WMS sits within a wider supply chain execution suite that includes a warehouse control system (WCS), transportation management, order management and labour management. For large operations running significant automation (conveyors, sortation, robotic case picking), Infios can coordinate both the WMS and the physical equipment through a single control point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is it good for?<\/strong> Infios is strongest in large, labour-intensive warehouses with significant automation investment, where WCS integration is critical. It also has a 3PL offering<\/a> with multi-client support, a built-in billing engine and a customer portal. For a small or mid-market 3PL, the full enterprise feature set is often more than you need, and the implementation timeline reflects that positioning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Er K\u00f6rber WMS egnet for sm\u00e5 og mellomstore 3PL-selskaper?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Technically, yes. Infios even markets a SaaS WMS for SMBs<\/a> with ready-made NetSuite and SAP Business One connectors. In practice, there are three things a smaller 3PL should weigh up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kostnad.<\/strong> Infios doesn\u2019t publish pricing, so you won\u2019t know the figure until you\u2019ve been through a sales cycle. Plan for the shape of it: a subscription or licence, a professional services engagement to tailor the implementation, and contract terms to negotiate. For a mid-market 3PL, that\u2019s a procurement exercise rather than a software purchase, and it needs sign-off to match.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Implementation time.<\/strong> Infios says most implementations take around 4 to 8 months. A standard Clarus implementation<\/a> goes live in around 12 weeks. If you\u2019re a 3PL trying to win a contract and get operational before the client loses patience, that difference can decide whether you can bid at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kompleksitet.<\/strong> Infios\u2019s WCS, conveyor control, robotics orchestration and advanced labour management are valuable in a highly automated facility. If you\u2019re a 3PL running several semi-manual warehouses across the UK, you\u2019re paying for capability you won\u2019t use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hvem denne st\u00f8rrelsesgruppen passer godt for:<\/strong> A mid-market 3PL that\u2019s planning significant automation investment (conveyors, sortation, automated storage and retrieval) and can treat a multi-month implementation as a capital project. If that\u2019s you, Infios is worth evaluating alongside automation consultants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who it doesn\u2019t work for:<\/strong> A 3PL that needs to deploy quickly, run several regional sites<\/a> with different client needs, or replace spreadsheets without a long project plan. That\u2019s where Clarus fits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\"What<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Hvordan st\u00e5r Clarus WMS seg i forhold til K\u00f6rber n\u00e5r det gjelder kostnader og implementeringstid?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Cost and go-live speed are where the two platforms separate most clearly, and also where public information runs out fastest. Here\u2019s what can be verified, and what you\u2019ll need to ask for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Priser og totale eierkostnader<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Clarus publishes its tiers. Plans<\/a> start from \u00a31,000 a month base across Core, Scale and Enterprise. A full quote adds tiered user licensing, where the cost per user falls as you scale, plus a one-off implementation fee for configuring your layout, cleaning SKUs and setting up courier logic. What it never adds is a throughput charge: orders, shipments, SKUs, stock records, locations and carriers are unlimited, so taking on a client or running a peak doesn\u2019t move the invoice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Infios doesn\u2019t publish pricing, so nobody can build an honest like-for-like table from public information. Any five-year comparison you find online, including ones that flatter Clarus, is guesswork.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Det du kan gj\u00f8re, er \u00e5 be begge leverand\u00f8rene om \u00e5 svare skriftlig p\u00e5 de samme sp\u00f8rsm\u00e5lene f\u00f8r du sammenligner noe som helst:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. The subscription, and exactly what makes it go up: users, sites, throughput, or all three.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Implementering og profesjonelle tjenester, som et eget bel\u00f8p med vedlagt omfang.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. \u00c5rlig support og vedlikehold, samt om oppgraderinger er inkludert eller m\u00e5 betales separat.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Kontraktens varighet, oppsigelsestid og hva det koster \u00e5 si opp kontrakten.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Run that for both and the difference will be obvious without anyone having to invent a number. Our WMS cost guide<\/a> covers what else to include. The structural point stands on its own: Clarus publishes a starting price and doesn\u2019t bill on volume, and Infios quotes per deal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Proof point:<\/strong> St John\u2019s Hall Storage<\/a>, a 3PL, cut its invoicing time by 90% with Clarus 3PL billing<\/a>. Its managing director used to spend around four days at the end of each month checking invoices by hand, and stopped once the Clarus data proved consistently accurate. Every putaway, pick, pack, storage day, value-added service and return is now recorded as the work happens, so nothing goes unbilled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Gjennomf\u00f8ringshastighet<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    A standard Clarus project goes live in around 12 weeks. Infios puts most of its implementations at 4 to 8 months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The gap comes from the scope of the project rather than vendor effort. An enterprise deployment has to work through:<\/p>\n\n\n\n